A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
剧情还行，就是太简单，放在美剧里面40分钟都觉拖沓，更何况这是90分钟的电影。里面充满了各种插科打诨来拖时间
蛮好看的，怪还挺可爱的，看起来以为需要肉体博弈，没想到是精神方面的战斗。以为是战士，结果是法师。
【D+】现在连恶魔都开始讲究数学和物理，做驱魔人真是越来越不容易了。
个人认为，这部片子的逻辑其实一开始就跑没了，因为任何一个正常家庭，面对一个急于出售、价格低廉、装修诡异的大宅子，不都应该采取惟恐避而不及的态度吗？看似坚定的母亲，其实对孩子的成长缺乏关心，从她推出的方案来看，她早已将青少年当作流量的象征，甚至根本不考虑这些方案带给青少年的伤害。直到女儿出事，她才意识到就在她操纵着别人时，一股神秘力量也在操纵着她的家人。看似善良的父母，实际上也十分自私自利，而一直被暴凌的女儿才是全片中最无辜的存在。真实映照了“地狱在人间”的主题，也显示出了面对强大的邪恶力量，所谓的挣扎也只是虚妄。
三分不能在多了，刚开始以为是个鬼屋片，后来发现地窖门来回来去自动开关，就不知道拿个东西挡上。惊喜部分是联动量子力学…一下有了科学神秘主义…
氛围营造的不错，从头到尾也不拉胯，看完其他人的解析文章，感觉隐喻有点深啊。
冷色调不错，节奏拖沓，逻辑混乱，如坐针毡后果然看到了狼牙棒爆头的爽点，杀死宿主，自己替代宿主，也印证了与恶龙缠斗，自身亦变成恶龙。给你5分鼓励
进入另外一个空间的画面记忆尤深，最后的结局也是后背发凉
没我想象的惊悚，但是节奏还不错，最后一波反杀不错，还黑化了，人性啊
怪物造型倒是眼前一亮但是宏观来看着怪别扭的
算是经典套路吧，就是这个特效实在是……肉眼可见的没钱
细节处理的有一些不好，但整体还是给人眼前一亮。
小成本制作，没啥令人惊喜的桥段和特效画面。氛围还行但前期剧情寡淡如水，整体设定和人物塑造也都比较老套。但是看到女主在为social media campaign的pitch提案就很有亲切感。唯一出彩的地方大概是结局。一句话总结就是薛定谔的女儿。btw数学很恐怖这件事，我从初中以后就知道了……
不恐怖，不吓人，不聪明。即猜到了开头，也猜到了结局，但系没猜到这是个妖蛾子的故系。
比起单纯的鬼魂附身或邪教招魔，本片因为薛定谔理论和古古怪怪数学公式的加成，会让人对后面的剧情更加期待一些。
剧情还行，就是太简单，放在美剧里面40分钟都觉拖沓，更何况这是90分钟的电影。里面充满了各种插科打诨来拖时间
老套的小成本恐怖片，整部片子就一个人在忙活，还是瞎忙活。
感觉恐怖氛围还是蛮强的 不错哇 就是故事好像有点没看明白 怪物长相经验
剧情：6
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
