Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
不是，这片子只有6.3分认真的吗？拍的感觉相当对味啊！！！
节奏很稳但剧情很无聊。没有一个元素是令人惊喜的。
是女导演啊，怪不得这个恐怖片有些画面还挺唯美的，让我想起了生吃，那个电影画风也挺美的
看的有的容易出戏，想营造某种风格，但是感觉没有达到。 感觉韩国有段时间没有输出什么好的作品了，跟疫情时间也同步的？
黑道的结局都很凄凉。也很耐人寻味。正是用另一种比较极端的方法来展现了这个世界上的其中一些真面目。
还行，感觉还挺写实，像是真实的故事。
在当今时代。当你出现差的一面太多父母根本不把你当成人看。一心只想把孩子培养成材，堆积巨大压力让孩子无法承受导致自沙屡屡皆是。根本不会了解孩子想要的是什么。
看得一头雾水，应该不是我一个人觉得逻辑混乱。
莫名其妙的电影，事情交代的乱七八糟，一堆不知道什么时候出现过的人和人名，比目鱼是谁，被塞海胆的是谁，阿媚他女朋友为什么会去那个酒吧，男主为什么很乐于跟他的债主合伙，最后男主是跟谁合作了，为什么哲镇不把孙老直接弄死，为什么男主又要杀了孙老，浪费2小时
不恐怖，还有点意犹未尽，总感觉还没演完，还应该发生点什么。
怎么说呢……反省一下自己的教育理念吧。你是为了自己还是真的为小孩好。
自己神操作点错资源下载，看了十几分钟才发现在看恐怖片，受国内恐怖片的摧残，误会这只"鸟"是小女孩的幻想，最终走向经神病系列结局，事实并不是...
比起新世界 差太多了。故事讲不清，人物做不实，关系展不开，反转不惊喜。
We Finnish people just occasionally hatch things
三星吧，勉强能看，毕竟最近也确实没啥能看的了，剧情过于寡淡了，人物角色也都没立起来，大场面也没有，看到最后甚至有种强行潦草收尾的感觉。
很难不去和新世界比较，只是一旦比较起来，就感觉差太多，单论演技，每个都还行，就是有点儿角色和演员不契合的感觉，只有两个角色没有违和感，一个是赌场老板，每天追债那个，另一个是神似金允石那个贩毒大佬，他俩对味儿，别的都差点意思。
莱托怎么DC漫威都混这么差，长得帅也不顶用啊。有没有一种可能我们想看莱托演吸血鬼不是演这种。
小女孩的演技是真的好，本片教育意义大于恐怖片本身，建议那些虎妈狼爸观看。
粗制滥造的cult片，芬兰和北欧其他几国拍电影的水平差出了一个苍穹
千万不要欺负老实人，否则后果很严重。但这个世界的游戏规则就是欺负老实人，所以要想把压在身上的规则去掉，一定要和命运抗争到底。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
