Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
真的好难看。笑死，看的时候分还是6分，看完过来就是5.9分，感觉还会掉。
画面和音乐超美。故事上，氛围烘托不错，但作为悬疑片，几乎从电影的三分之一处就完全猜到结尾，尤其给手帕的特写实在太过刻意。而且最后的揭秘除了没有惊喜感，对于逻辑推理的演绎也实在是有些过于简单。比如说指出是表哥去撬开了神庙大石头，hello？请问男主角是有天眼吗？表哥居然还当场就认了，实在是有些侮辱观众。
准备花钱买票的朋友，改成花钱买书吧！［尼罗河上的惨案］比《尼罗河上的惨案》里描写的尼罗河上的惨案还惨！
比起78版，22版在细节线索上的增删调改使得这起凶杀案变得不够完美。当那句「带她去找鲍里斯」换人之口说出，就存在了凶手非独处的可能，这点认为是改编失败的地方。另外，个人一直认为优秀精巧的悬疑探侦片一定从不用剪辑顺序遮掩线索，勇敢的让观众和侦探共享所有的线索，然后用一种“刁钻”或是“难以预料”的手法来完成案件，让人恍然。很遗憾这起案件本身就是很普通的手法，倘若像78版那样果敢，只会陷入平庸。但选择用剪辑来隐藏，是更为低级的露怯。最后，抛弃78版神庙那段惊艳的运镜出场又没带来更为惊艳的设计，真的很蠢。
新版看完让我不敢恋爱
有人众筹把这个波洛探长丢进尼罗河里吗？我出十块，不能再多了。
能根据海鸟来判断风向，也能根据颜料推断凶手。欲望是如此可怕，爱情是如此危险。沙漠中浪漫的尼罗河有着致命的诱惑，引诱铤而走险的亡命鸳鸯在轮渡上表演。真相又是如此明晰，船上没有复仇的旧爱，只有贪婪的演员。波洛自然看得懂一切，用胡子当面具遮盖了伤口这么多年，世间情事，大抵都浪漫而凶险。
觉得还行吧！主要是原著故事真的很精彩！让我再次想起来，我要去看阿婆的剩下几本没看过的原著小说了。
这片子最大的噱头就是演员 剧情基本也没什么期待 凶手交代的也太快了点…bouc好可怜 …锤子真的是分分钟让我想起前任………………阿加莎的作品还是BBC拍的比较好……
第一部每个片段都有胸，这部木有，不喜欢。鼠人、尸体、改造女，吸血鬼见光炸
摄影真的棒，但前面铺垫也真的好无聊！一战揭秘男主身世那段虽然不算长，但也是拖节奏的。凶手是真的没惊喜（因为其他人比起这俩动机真的弱爆了），而且布克中枪后，汉莫完全没有下意识躲避怕伤到自己，其实这里已经暴露的很明显了。来豆瓣写短评的时候才发现女二原来不是玛格特罗比啊，你俩也太像了！导演能力确实有限，对《贝尔法斯特》更加不期待了。
先说改编后的人设，为什么这个波洛。丧气又冷血容易暴怒还阴郁。这是波洛？一副厌恶自己的职业厌世的样子。真是够了。再说剧情。之前tv版和78版。女闺蜜的跟踪真的神出鬼没。让人不寒而栗。而且非常神经质。让人相信是会拔枪射杀别人的人。这里改的不管是角色的演绎还是剧情都凸显不了。还是要说，如果肯导这么不喜欢菠萝。真的不要接了。我作为观众已经体会到这种不喜欢了，作为阿婆的淑芬。感觉很糟糕。
震惊，blm口号已经被编剧用歪了：黑人非但不能是反派，更不能是死者。
开头跳舞就把我尬住了，侦探的黄昏恋看的莫名其妙，可能为了突出主题爱吧
其实还好啦，完美完成任务，本来翻拍就是为了看特效跟美景的
真没人关心胡子，以及那灰色脑细胞里有爱情这简直像听到黑斯廷斯深爱波洛那样让我震撼一整年
还行，可以随意一看。不那么也不那么坏。只是，旧世界的故事真的是旧。jazz特别好听！开头的黑白片段更有趣一点。结尾可能是要去求爱这样的桥段没想到会有。导演经过上次的列车的历练，演技和拍摄能力都提高了，真是爱学习的优秀生！
阿加莎的书我毫不夸张的说我看过全套，这个故事我也看过n个版本，我不知道是谁突发奇想想要尝试一些改变，但是敢打波洛胡子的主意，how dare you???
全员演技不在线，风光虽然假可是杜比影院效果真的好啊。5
太无聊了！和同导演前几年的《东方快车谋杀案》一脉相承。一部能把半个影院的观众都快看睡着的“悬疑”作品，只有美景和美女值得一看。85分的原作，80分的卡司，70分平均演技，最后变成50分的作品。求求肯导放过阿婆的作品吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
