Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
欠缺精细化打磨的剧本，以及明显的不在地。是不必要存在的是枝裕和电影。
可能因为导演是是枝裕和，比起其他韩影又多了不少的格外的温情，确实很像东京教父，这种临时拼凑又注定不可能长久的家人会有一种特殊的感动。
关于生育孩子的问题总是聚焦于母亲，那父亲呢？这是责任的空缺，是人性的沉默之处。“在生下来之前打掉罪就更轻么”这大概是我永远也不认同的点。
too tedious to watch
是枝裕和拍家庭本身就充满理想化，这放到失真的韩国语境里就变得完全没有可信度了。裴斗娜确实显老了，感觉印象里还是《空气人形》里那样。
文化上的水土不服+对女性题材的陌生，让枝裕和拍出了一部愈加保守和中庸的作品，甚至可能由于语言不通在对宋康昊等演员的调教上也趋近于零，几位完全是轻松的行活表演，可以说是枝裕和自真相之后再次暴露了对异种文化题材驾驭力的孱弱，在他自己的作品体系里无疑是倒数，而且如果换个韩国抓马系的导演反而大概率会拍的比这好看
个人最爱的两段：
凌晨3点20，所有的气息都美翻天，摩天轮疯狂截屏
生硬的用小孩的“傻”，再一次把一群没有没有血缘关系的人拉拢成所谓的家人的故事线我觉得无比尴尬的洗车镜头，旁边的观众却湿了眼眶。宋康昊的演技除了面对自己的小孩时的表情还算细腻，之外没有留下什么很深的印象，裴斗娜更是陪跑。唉贼失望，这跟李沧东不是一个水准的东西呐。
剧情的结构不错，再联想到最近的社会新闻。。。但影帝的表演真的没什么出彩。
快看瞌睡了。依然是散装家庭式故事，但是却没有《小偷家族》那般震撼，也没有日系的那种深沉情感，整部影片的情绪浮于表面，比白开水还无趣，明明有很多引爆的点，是枝裕和却什么都没有做，换个人拍，加点动作戏，节奏紧张一点也许更好，IU不错！
它确实有是枝裕和的味道，但又确实是一部韩国电影
棒子国顶级一线阵容，故事差了点意思。加油吧，国际大导功成名就了还愿意各种尝试创作是一件好事
这个女警察的身份设定有点让人震惊，刚开始以为他背后有一些隐藏的故事，所以她也是被父母抛弃还是生不了？怎么最后就收养了羽星………然而并没有，就很神奇，包括东秀之前就是因为杀人蹲的监狱么？后来为啥又杀人…。嫖客的老婆找孩子要自己养也不了了之，很多情节交代的模凌两可
感觉还是得给韩国导演拍吧。剧情线有点跳啊。远不如小偷家族了。虽然很像的风格。。。。。
7分。仍然是是枝裕和的温柔童话。只不过没有给我温柔一击的感觉，温柔倒是一如既往。不知道日韩的法律是怎么样的，但放任一个杀人凶手不去抓捕，只为了等待她接下来可能的更轻的犯罪行为。感觉说不通吧？重案组的人会为打拐的警察让路？轻重缓急好像不是这个顺序吧。另外，日本导演镜头下的韩国和韩国导演镜头下的很不一样。在《掮客》之前，韩影里好像很少海边和火车的镜头，也不会有这样公路旅行般的桥段。而如果韩国导演来拍《掮客》的话，多半会是一部悬疑犯罪片。宋康昊的影帝应该是过去以来的一种总结表彰，因为本片给他的表现空间不算很大。
片中的人贩子指的是生下婴儿但又不想要的女人把孩子遗弃到教会事先放好的盒子里，主角一伙把这样的孩子偷出来，卖给想要孩子的家庭以营利，和那种直接从家庭中偷抢拐卖孩子的罪行是有区别的，当然，都是违法的。
4.男主在列车上问女主之前留下字条是会接回孩子及如果舍不得可以留下孩子时，每当女主真心想回答时列车都进入隧道，银幕黑屏……表明女主不能正面面对的这个镜头设计给人留下深刻的印象
煽情有點多，我好久沒在戲院哭得那麼慘了。抽離出來其實故事有點太童話，但我還是進去了，羽星被疼愛得讓我很羨慕。中段節奏不太好，有點不好奇結局的意思，而且結局也有點多餘。但如果在看完的當下，我的滿足感是很高的。
是枝拍韓片沒有水土不服，主題依然延續他一直以來探討的「生育」問題，可惜還是缺乏了對韓國社會的觀察，在他導演作中並不算上乘，但看完後又確實會被是枝的溫柔所感動，他永遠都能細膩地刻畫底層小人物的溫情，這也許就是我們愛是枝的原因。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
