A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
距离第一部过去都五年了，这五年短视频飞速发展，带动了类似爽片的热度，加上极度不景气的电影行业，期待这种片子的人就更多了。各种电影解说把片中人名换个外号，随便剪剪其中的动作场面都能获得几万赞。说回电影，延续了第一部的情节设置，一拳超人马东锡独挑大梁，干翻杀人不眨眼的暴力罪犯，从越南追回韩国。饰演大反派的孙锡久（有点像我的一个前同事）之前在《恋爱缺席的罗曼史》和《我的解放日志》里演的都是斯斯文文略带腼腆的男人，在这部里，一百八十度大变身，一言不合就砍人，胸前还纹着汉字“不惧xx（没看清）”，结局肯定逃不过要被马东锡暴揍。
雷纳德是一位手艺精湛的裁缝，一场火灾之后，他离开了伦敦，来到芝加哥，在这里经营着一间属于自己的裁缝店。店里的员工除了雷纳德自己外，还有一个名叫梅布尔的姑娘，梅布尔的父亲是一个臭名昭著的恶棍，背负着父亲的“盛名”，梅布尔下定决心要攒够钱，去看一看这个肮脏黑暗的街区以外的世界。
里里外外都跌跌撞撞的一部电影。7.9分？现在要求都这么低了吗？
影片短小精悍，有滋有味，值得静下心来认真观赏细细品味。在最近众多低成本新片中，这部算是佼佼者了，五月的惊喜之一。
剧本杀电影，没啥意思。很厌恶《暴力史》式的结尾，裁缝形式和影片内容结合得不好。Immigrants, we get the job done.
什么会计啊，厨子啊，裁缝啊都尽量不要去惹了
虽然舞台剧的感觉有点浓，但仍然非常值得一看
故事其实不算多新颖，主角刚出场就有一股深夜食堂老板的调调，很容易预判到后面的发展。但单场景的话剧式编排就和电影里的服装一样精致，叙事节奏十分古典，不慌不忙、娓娓道来，在现今实属难得。值得悬疑、惊悚、绅装爱好者一看。
这种在密闭室内发生整个故事的低成本电影多么适配防疫居家期间观看 连观感都透着魔幻现实主义
③孙锡久饰演的反派没任何气势。回头看看第一部，尹启相三人组那才叫真正不要命的“狠”，那才是真正能让观众感到惧怕的犯罪头目；
马东锡的动作场面少了好多啊，到时孙锡久的动作戏挺不错，而且他的狠相好有震慑感！
没预期惊喜，但还是很喜欢。第一反应是国内翻拍啊，又一想，别糟践好东西了
没看明白！莫名其妙！裁缝的动机在哪里？他怎么就知道拉封丹黑帮在哪里！又准确的把黑老大支过去火并呢？逻辑说不通的地方不少！
“如果你不追求完美，就无法做出伟大的事情，但真正的完美是不可能实现的。”
像是老师讲剧本的时候给大家讲的“如何玩弄观众”的案例集合。
信任游戏，或者说不信任游戏，重点不在于说服，而在于挑起怀疑。裁缝和家中仆役一样，属于“看不见的人”，你不会怀疑他工于心计因为他无计可施，你不会怀疑他别有图谋因为你是他的衣食父母。而到最后tailor无疑说了太多谎以至观众也无法判断他的起源故事究竟为何，他是躲在顺从面孔下的无面人。以及马克里朗斯真的非常擅长演这类角色。
疫情片荒期间可算神作了，一个场景竟然可以拍一部电影，编剧真牛，把这种老派悬疑又拍出了新鲜的感觉，小空间的拉扯，几个反转也以极端内敛的方式在最合适的时候抖出，达到惊人的执行效果。要说真有什么值得商榷的地方，那就是像马克里朗斯这样的演员就不会演什么简单的角色，影片开头刻意强调裁缝“普通”的身份，反而引起了观众强烈的怀疑。
谈笑风生，杀人无形。有一点没照顾到，箱子里一直滴血怎么没了下文？
玩了个东南亚叙事，可惜又回到了韩国，缺少第一部移民社区的空间感，各方面都显得像一般的动作片了。既然工作地点没变，他怎么管起整个首尔的治安了，膨胀了
仿佛看了一场话剧，谁能想到普通的老裁缝其实是个“扫地僧'呢。整部电影如同片名和全程的独白一样，适当的剪裁，细密的针线，把零散的线索缝制成套装。马克·里朗斯的演技于细微处见波澜，最后的动作戏再多发挥一些就好了。果然干裁缝的都是狠人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
