Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
Ai拥有人性，那里让人热泪盈眶人性指的是真善美爱与信任，而不是大开杀戒，尔虞我诈。一人一狗一啰嗦的零件，都能让人眼眶酸滞。
我永远喜欢看一片白纸的灵魂探索世界的故事～制造机器人有些俗套（隔壁的超能查派！），不过这样旧点子新包装的公路片倒也不错。
不功不过，娓娓道来。实话说没有特别被感动到。汉克斯演技真好，机器人和狗都好萌。
独角戏，没有cast out感人，那个排球真的落泪了
最近的美国科幻片越来越不尊重人类智商了，连机器人都能造出来，却不知道听收音机，连别的地方没有臭氧层空洞这个简单的消息都不知道……
看起来像是十几年前的剧本故事，不像是这几年的电影
Jeff演技真的好好。比很多真人演员都好啊，怎么办到的。//就是杜威走得太突然了，啊不会说话但是一直默默做事还贡献了自己眼睛的杜威啊。
末日生存独角戏，狗狗很加分。但当科幻电影看其实算比较平庸那种。
人、机、狗之间的感情令人动容，越是在这个个体原子化&生活智能化的时代，就越容易被这种简单而紧密的关系，无条件的爱与信任所打动
寂寞又温情的末日组合，三个生灵的情感联结和传递。
熟悉的配方，熟悉的味道，熟悉的演技，熟悉的人物关系，熟悉的后启示录景观，熟悉的Don Mclean……虽然视听效果优秀，但有些东西注定不是常看常新。
像风沙一样干，就像开着每一部西部公路片的破房车，二人组换一个核能液压AI养狗机器人，新冠停工期去各大灾难丧尸复联四片场打了一转，选择拍一段某中国导演的某禁片。正当汤老汉歇菜我以为准备不需要演员开始正片时我丢了个球
除了短暂的回忆场景中的人物，以及未见其人的第二辆车，以及狗和蝴蝶，全片其实只有一个传统意义上的演员。
💯 电影，致敬 Tom Hanks，演技无可挑剔~
3.5，正宗好莱坞工业味儿。片名又译《末日求生：我和我的机器人儿子》、《极客老处男的逆袭之我和我自己生了一个儿子》、《阿宅日记：死都不社交》、《未来社会观察：人不如狗》，以及Kevin Kelly下本书的灵感《科技要什么2：情感篇》。
评分太高了，其实比较一般，可说是一部“为赋新词强说愁”的作品。老米喜欢搞这种末世感的东西，弄个动物，弄个机器人什么，来点小情调，体现一下对弱者与动物的关怀。这么牛逼的末世科技，汽车怎么不是无人驾驶？还要人工操作，太落伍了！当然，汤姆汉克斯的表演还是挺稳，机器人神神叨叨也有意思，但整体也并无太多出奇之处。
末日，老男人，一条狗，两个机器人。（哭个不停）
设定和场景真的太fallout了吧！另外，是因为苹果投资的所以加州还没事？
细腻温暖，我喜欢这个结尾。有人走，有人来。想起我只在金门大桥上走过一回，是跟我的父母一起。真好。
m（21.11.21.13:28）看了半天看见弹幕我才认出男主是汤姆汉克斯😓 唉 要是小杜和芬奇都在就好了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
