Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一起自由地乱涂乱画吧，涂鸦吧！画画的初心与初衷就是这么纯粹简单呢
剧情很充实，其实像是十年前甚至是二十年前的感觉，一切不出意料，但是还是很动人啊。质朴又动人。比之前几部好。
呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜特别可爱又好笑，我永远爱蜡笔小新，我后面差点哭了，救命，喜欢喜欢喜欢
不要追求太多合理性，设定和最后的燃点都值得打四星。只是我真的很怀念黄金时期的小新剧场版啊…就算用成人的逻辑来思考都无可挑剔，现在只能跟着傻乐呵了
本片的尴尬，也可能是蜡笔小新整个动画ip发展至今的尴尬，在于故事对成人而言愈发低幼化，让儿童来看，那些成人向的屎尿屁桥段又不合适。虽然也注入了想象力和温情，但团结一致拯救世界的故事走向太模式化，当涂鸦王国设定的新鲜感过去后，就对着吵吵嚷嚷的画面犯困了。
虽然剧情结尾煽动掉我几滴眼泪，但这部分镜和美术好一般啊，没有那种怪诞綺麗浮夸的感觉了，明明还是涂鸦世界来着。特地又翻了下结尾演职员表，果然不是我错觉，这部美术不是汤浅政明了。
2021看哭的第一部电影，小新拯救了春日部和涂鸦王国是为了大家，更是为了能和娜娜子姐姐吃饭。不论时代如何变化，不管我们手中拿的是书本还是手机，都要心存美好。孩子们不断长大，童年渐渐远去，希望心中的自由与童真能一直伴我同行。
7分，把涂鸦画满整个城市这个设定太浪漫了💕
看哭了555近几年最好看的一部，大人们责怪小孩的自私惯性，三个纸片角色的牺牲都很真挚感人，假娜娜子为了救小新而融化，小内裤拉扯身体的告别，肥嘟嘟左卫门再次登场，结局又是集体式的热血，每一年的小新都好好喔。
我喜欢蜡笔小新，因为那种单纯治愈能让人热泪盈眶的故事情节，只有在蜡笔小新里才会有！小时候看蜡笔小新，就是觉得好笑，可爱，恶趣……长大以后再看，笑着笑着就哭了，每次看蜡笔小新都能让我有一种拥抱生活，拥抱希望的冲动，不管明天怎么样，今天一定要快乐！这一部剧，现在是我心中的天花板！
100分钟里还有很多旧剧场的感觉，比如大人小孩被分开就很有野生王国的意思，小新千方百计回春日部又有点烤肉之路的意思，最后广播号召大家一起涂鸦又有点大人帝国的感觉。
残酷又现实，好在小新的故事结尾永远真善美。矢岛晶子和藤原启治的声音不在了，延续的小新也依然是小新，以及发现肥嘟嘟左卫门的配音是卡米亚🤣 来年见。
假如像小新大方地撩妹，女友一定一大堆🤪
还是真的不错，人性刻画得真的很好，一如既往地爱这个五岁的小屁孩
内裤君牺牲自己弥补缺失的线笑死我了
感觉一般呀，设定上有前后矛盾的地方，核心立意又有些低幼
心情不好的时候就要看小新 心情好更要看小新
陪孩子看，就那个样子吧，远没有儿时的兴奋劲儿了
宇宙中最自私的是人类，人类中最自私的是大人。
真的很爱蜡笔小新这种让你眼泪婆娑的时候又猝不及防地丢出一个笑点的喜剧方式，就是前半段节奏有点拖沓了，后半段渐入佳境，小新用蜡笔救众人让捧成英雄与后面弄丢蜡笔被众人指责的情节实在讽刺，当然光靠爱与热血是拯救不了世界的，但这是蜡笔小新，是我们依然向往的理想世界
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
