剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 湛阳云 7小时前 :

    看到一半就开始想,不会整部电影都是女主的被害妄想症发作了吧,叫policeman来结果是搞了一场乌龙。

  • 洁雅 6小时前 :

    那些隐藏在真实生活中的罪恶,正如同电影中体现的那样,捉摸不定,含混不清,却又如影随形,绝大部分人,无法在生活中的罪恶发生之前锁定真凶,而身边人的猜疑和漠视,更是将受害人推入绝望的深渊。影片最后,女主虽然奇迹般地反杀,可那更像是导演为了宽慰观影者的心灵而编织的童话,反观现实,我们只能看到受害者的墓碑。

  • 祖子明 7小时前 :

    本来剧情挺好的,但是通过声音吓唬人的恐怖片很低级。

  • 次冰巧 5小时前 :

    地铁那段戏一度我都快要以为偷窥者才是女主的灵魂伴侣的时候,被塑料袋里的玩意吓死了

  • 珍梦 1小时前 :

    除了结尾的割喉大BUG,想不出给它低分的原因。女主的颜,语言不通陌生环境新婚关系的设定太妙了,整部片阴郁寒冷的构图把紧张的气氛架构起来,还展示了导演不错的审美,推荐。

  • 胤铭 3小时前 :

    女性议题该说的很确切,但是作为一部悬疑片,也太无聊了和刻板了,后半段太无趣了,直到最后来个反转真的很乏味

  • 雯婧 8小时前 :

    结尾到男主与杀人犯各自离开房间后在走廊四目相对那刻就可以结束了。

  • 普良骏 5小时前 :

    无法共情的只能嫉妒你们好幸运。

  • 系吉月 8小时前 :

    还可以,烂片满天飞的现在难得来一部还看得下去的惊悚片

  • 雅倩 4小时前 :

    感觉拍成短片会更好一些,一个半小时讲的东西并不算多。“你为什么看我”“你不看我怎么知道我看你”“我不看你我怎么知道你看我”

  • 玥云 3小时前 :

    就算高潮只有最后二发子弹 但是基本全程无尿点的流畅

  • 闭雅诗 7小时前 :

    三星都给女主的美貌 每一个造型都风情十足 惊艳动人 特别是一开始女主独自逛街还有和老公偶遇犯罪现场

  • 梦琛 7小时前 :

    60分。及格吧。小成本,有几个地方确实被吓到。女性的直觉以及遭遇的恶意等等。很担心最后她连丈夫也射一枪。可难道那样处理岂不是更爽哉?

  • 茆春柔 8小时前 :

    监视者怎么老演变态,可能是因为长得就真变态

  • 曲绿夏 3小时前 :

    场景、氛围都没问题,但最后的结局有点草草了事。虎头蛇尾的电影。

  • 滕小凝 6小时前 :

    吓得腿软。狗男人要你有什么用,帮不上一点儿忙还没有同理心。

  • 雪玉 9小时前 :

    3.5吧,还算比较不错的,气氛营造的还可以

  • 王兰月 8小时前 :

    从某个角度来说,我们总是更在意自己的感受而忽略了对方,也许生活中碰到谋杀的几率很小,但其他事情不也是如此吗,很适合情侣来看看

  • 莲桐 6小时前 :

    出片方是阿联酋,故事背景在罗马尼亚,开始以为会有政治管控啥的,慢慢看下,只是小美女为爱情奔走异乡后遭遇变态。在婚姻中,激情是最容易退潮的成分,安全感永远靠自己去营建~从挂窗帘到会用枪;太长寿的老人某种意义上是年轻人的压力,尤其是无法分担的情况下,煎熬会把心逐渐拧巴到扭曲,甚至生出恶魔。

  • 星鸿 3小时前 :

    我看到一半以为的《监视者》,男主变了心为了让女主离开他而设了这个局,为了击溃女主的心理防线而设计了各种心理暗示。结果没有料到女主偷偷学了罗马尼亚话,听懂了来找隔壁女人的那个男人砸门时对里面人的提醒而渐渐发现了事情的真相。实际的《监视者》,男主:我是谁,我在哪?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved