Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
全球观光，反转再转，套路+舒适区，很完整很商业很合格，就是令人提不起兴趣。
有枪战，有追车，有搞笑，有反转，有夺宝奇兵的感觉，还有最美的女贼，是一部合格的商业娱乐片，我觉得挺好看的，估计用了好多CG。
妈妈在成为妈妈之前，曾经也是个憧憬浪漫的小女孩
为徐帆老师量身定制的独角戏，教科书般演绎了一个「完人」母亲，一切都如此中规中矩，煽情意图就是如此不加掩饰。叛逆女儿、重病婆婆、毒瘾弟弟与一位癌症母亲，意料之中地堆砌一些极端而刻意的催泪桥段，仿佛可以看到导演嘶吼着“都给我哭”。人物设计过于无暇，泯灭了现实中一切母亲身上可能出现的烦躁与不耐烦，对于母爱的理解停留于说理与口号，角色沦为了纯粹服务于歌颂母爱的标签。抗癌历程看得出与《滚蛋吧！肿瘤君》类似的情感表达，很难说影片有什么值得挖掘与惊喜的记忆点，灯光亮起，观众只记住了徐帆演技真无敌。
中规中矩的爆米花电影，至少不赖。不过强森的戏路真的好窄啊，这角色太不适合他了。
從公佈演員名單開始就處處透露出「勞資不差錢」的網飛真的是在年末播出了一個衝刺kpi的好ip，而且很大的概率我覺得從結局來看就是要出續集的。
三位大明星合作的平庸之作，偷盗过程毫无智慧可言，惊险刺激也做不到，所谓的反转更是缺乏惊喜。
节奏看着貌似很快，全世界各地跑，然后各种似曾相识的剧情，007、速激、丛林大冒险……热闹之外，其实是无聊。
还行吧徐帆 祁厅长演技在线 那个闺女演的也可以，珍惜身边的亲人吧，失去了才知道珍贵
就說腐感十足的配對不香麼~Ryan和Gal角色互換感覺會更香~
也不能说烂，就是老套，非常老套……还有点无聊。当然加朵还是美的。
only watched it to test my new dolby vision TV; I wouldn't even finish this stupid thing if not for Gal Gadot's breathtaking looks.
本片将时下的热门元素强行堆砌，充分实现了1+1+1=2的方程式。
（一天看两部巨石强森，每部都戳心感觉）；
关于我妈一件戳心的小事：她说不要哭，要坚强，她最爱我。
说它无脑也好，说它偷工减料也好，说它烂也好，yeah, but I love it.
嘴贱加憨憨的传统配方，外加必不可少的神秘美女，主角三人组就像是从之前的片场走过来，沿用各自的经典人设拼凑了部环游世界的偷盗片，冒险动作片该有的元素都有，意外的惊喜是一点都没有，最后的反转反转再反转太刻意了。
爆米花电影算及格吧。主要是金蛋还挺像Harry Potter那个！
为了看美女揍人，不过两个男主的戏份也还行啦。流畅却套路的夺宝冒险片。有点不能直视强森的后脑勺了……
RR每个角色都像本色出演哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
