Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
笨蛋+笨蛋=超级精英，而集合忧愁、懊悔、犯错的一生才能成为真正的“人”，不要怕被嘲笑，勇敢的去面对吧
青春是…热泪盈眶! (千潮姐姐跑步那段笑窒息了
我竟然能在蜡笔小新里看到要抓住当下，随性青春的思想。
也就还好吧，第一次看剧场版，分高的匪夷所思。柯南附体的小新。
青春に無駄なことなんて何ひとつない！
老大真帅…
“活在当下又怎么样，你这种自以为是的才是笨蛋。”
青春就是无数无意义的事情而组成人生最精彩的一部分
青春是…热泪盈眶! (千潮姐姐跑步那段笑窒息了
番长好帅🥰
这是一部能让成年人体会童年的欢乐的电影。又正如好姐妹所说，欢乐之外还有感动。能做到这些就已经可以说是不可多得的好电影了。
前面三分之二比较平，结尾高燃
蜡笔小新让人喜爱的点是，这个动漫团队，一直在尽力的提醒大家，要跳脱社会的异化，努力保持纯真，无论多少岁，都要保持孩子般的纯真，尽量，放下功利心，放下条条框框的规矩，毫无负担的装疯卖傻，肆意奔跑，天马行空的想象。生活中多些无厘头，享受生活中的小确幸。即使你在现实生活中过的有多么不如意，但看看蜡笔小新也能在枯死的内心中，再次生长出一丝丝 毫无负担的快乐。
嗯蜡笔小新一贯的恶搞风格，这种动画显然就是认真就输了的类型，不带脑子看还是挺乐呵的，真凶算是一开始就猜到了，但中途又洗掉了嫌疑，但最后发现果然还是他。
很强，剧情深度上达到了大人帝国和春日部男孩的水平，感情上几近个人最喜欢的猪之蹄和战国大合战。更不用说其推理部分的DM解答，伏笔设置和令人生草的动机（令和爱情故事是吧）都在水准线之上。4.5星，大概是小新剧场版前五的水平吧。
立意继续顶满，只是经过去年的神作后，这一部的沉浸感下降不少
青春是可以犯错但是不留遗憾，青春是影应该拥有美好的回忆。看了那么多关于青春的电影，没想到被一个幼稚园的孩子定义了。
这个剧场版，会让人联想到，春日部防卫队五人组长大以后会不会渐行渐远。。惆怅
嗯蜡笔小新一贯的恶搞风格，这种动画显然就是认真就输了的类型，不带脑子看还是挺乐呵的，真凶算是一开始就猜到了，但中途又洗掉了嫌疑，但最后发现果然还是他。
青春に無駄なことなんて何ひとつない！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
