Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
性爱与欲求不满的互文倒是略显心思，但两个老B灯的战斗力与残忍体现的铺陈显然篇幅不够。这真的是剧集的时代。复古调调还可以。但终究乏善可陈。
加一星给没有主角光环 战争的残酷就是子弹不会绕开你飞 故事的后半部特别是最后一场戏实在太烂了
太过普通，但还是会落泪，最好看的还是范伟。
华谊现在拍这种抗战题材，质感拿捏得已经很到位了，就是剧情可以再好好雕琢下，这片子结尾战斗部分一团乱，影响了整体的质量。
今天腊八 今年没有年三十
就像钢刀插入敌胸膛,
这两星给范伟，你大爷永远是你大爷。
几个镜头和段落还可以，但整体还是挺无聊的其实。
昨天去看了 真的感觉范伟老师演的太好啦 我全程都被他带动 哪怕一个背影立在那里都是可以传达出情绪的
不过，这种片确实不能要求太多。星星都给范伟吧。
电影的质感还是不错的，最亮的一幕是范伟丢手榴弹，只是情节上波折还是不太够，跟鬼子反派斗智斗勇的对抗表现得并不够充分
这个方案是从华盛顿派出三队人马，他们将分别前往全美国不同的安全地点。每支队伍都要随时做好宣布新的美国“总统”，接过国家指挥权的准备。如果苏联的核武器打掉了一支队伍，下一支队伍就会顶上。“这可不是本子上的抽象计划，而是详尽细致、进行过具体实践的周密计划。”曼说。演习通常需要数天时间，每次队伍离开华盛顿的时候，都要携带一名里根的内阁成员，他将作为总统的“继任者”。核战来临时可能引发极端紧张混乱的局面，他们希望整个方案在这样的条件下也能迅速得到实施。这是一个高于宪法和法律的方案，它创立了一套继任总统的新程序，曼指出，这一程序
制作得很正，味道是对的。但很遗憾整个本子太平了，人设从出场的一刻就是“死”的，无法让观众有任何对其命运变化的好奇心，只是按部就班的抗日传奇剧，这很致命。
好一出荡气回肠的铁道血与骨暴力挽歌，范伟老师从影以来最炸裂演技
制作和摄影精良，全面商业化的桥段和人物，但丢了《铁道游击队》好好讲故事的朴实。
服化道做的还是不错的，范伟老师的演技确实可靠，不过除此之外就没什么优点了。
不急不躁。鱷魚潭與閃靈斧還有藍色恐懼的浴缸，如若《Get Out》的富白人不能將靈魂移植年輕肉體。撕殺場面乾淨利落，高潮戲笑！翻！全！場！
我们先辈的英雄电影给拍成这样，处处都假的不行。剧情有似没有，莫名其妙迷迷糊糊，大雪纷飞一头雾水。只有范伟老师一个人在认认真真塑造着角色。包括张涵予在内所有人物都被蒙在皑皑白雪后面看不清楚。要不是时间太晚，我都想把老电影《铁道游击队》再看一遍。
从主题到每句台词都毫无新意却似乎沾沾自喜，人物和表达也刻意而平庸
剪辑好碎，东讲一头西讲一棒，转场又硬，问题是节奏还巨慢。最来劲的还是主角宣誓的部分。音乐最来劲，剪辑都隐形，完整展现。这其实都没啥，关键其他时候都挺敷衍。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
