这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
An absurdist classic
This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.
这部剧想要表达的东西还挺多的但是没有很好的表现出来。一样的恐怖片缺点就是太老套了。
阿帕图的故事结构一直不太成，有个前提就靠段子堆，这部也一样，拍情景喜剧没准可以，2个小时的电影看的可太吃力了。
细想可能展开拍个迷你剧更好，这么急匆匆地回顾女主和男孩的身世，雨露均沾，反而哪里都说得不够味。
期待了好久的美式恐怖，有点失望诶…从内容到氛围营造《鹿角》做的都不够出色，和同期的影片相比，感觉差了好多…
细想可能展开拍个迷你剧更好，这么急匆匆地回顾女主和男孩的身世，雨露均沾，反而哪里都说得不够味。
故事太单薄了，叙事节奏效率太低，主角光环过于强大，bug点太多！唯一可取的地方就是镜头感和画面很美～～～
就这？
莫名奇妙的电影，开始的男的怎么被传染的？女主和怪物打斗为什么没被传染，但是女主的哥就被传染了？难不成只传男不传女？？？？前面怪物这么牛，后面和女主打简直任女主杀啊！！！除了有点血腥，其它真是………………
看直到黎明游戏直播的时候我就觉得陀罗绝壁会喜欢温迪戈好家伙嗯！
段子够讽刺但台词不好笑，用脏话当笑点是一种偷懒。
243。听完整的呀，氛围感做得比较北欧，弱光摄影，景拍得也不错。就是剧本本身实在太浅了，想用补充女主身世的方法扩展内容量，但这与主故事融合得很糟糕。结尾还是轮回感吧，这片拍不了续集。
想到斯蒂芬金的一个短篇小说，一个小男孩的父亲喝了啤酒之后的变异故事
虽然剧情很烂 但非常喜欢这种冷色调与神秘主义
那有怎么样？看的爽就好了。
[视][19.10.24想看]导演<黑色弥撒><逃出熔炉>，小男孩像<神童>2019，陀螺监制，怪兽部分一直不错，微血。两个破碎的家庭，西方对父辈的执着，有点烂尾。今年还有奈飞剧版<鹿角男孩>
不吓人也不好看 没想到一个小木屋进门被怪物杀掉的桥段硬是来了三次 高潮部分怎么随随便便怪物就被杀掉了
倒也不是多么难看
刻板印象里的“文艺片”。兄弟俩小演员要是一个人演或许能提个最佳男主，但俩人都挺不错。
可算明白了，这电影烂在结尾上，当着哥哥的面弄死他爸他弟是吧？？？完全不理解，结尾之前其实还算可以一看的程度，但是结尾给整个片子糊上了一坨屎。还有中间医院老师姐弟牵着卢卡斯三人并排走的那段慢镜头给我看笑了
为什么评论区大家一副很期待的样子，这部平平无奇的烂片。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
