Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
让人唏嘘。
故事正经的就像部真人片，特效很棒，但作为一部以巴斯光年为主角的皮克斯动画片来说，有点太无趣了，还是动画里那个中二的巴斯比较可爱
让人唏嘘。
宇宙，未来科技，飞船，机器人，矿石，能源，特别是那只可爱聪明的机器猫，这是一部处处充满了小朋友最爱的元素的电影。
没想到居然皮克斯居然有一天会弄出这样一个东西……它浑身上下都是正确的，但就是不好看……（顺便一提，这是我在豆瓣上标注的第 3000 部看过的电影）
Sox is the only good one.
有点牵强，老年巴斯怎么拿到那么强的科技飞船
作为一个toy story粉，我很满意了🥹
而改变过去，带来的结果是那些经历都会消失，而我们这一生中，最重要的就是经历，那些我们做过的事和我们见到的人。
怎么说呢，不能讲不好看，新人物确实很出彩，但是总让我觉得已经是热锅冷饭来回炒了。
⋯只能說跟《壯志凌雲2》同期上太吃虧，同樣是「直男為滿足征服慾放棄人生規劃」，明顯出於懶惰用自己打自己省去成長，同時反面也沒有過硬的逆思維；倒是穿越戲加上Chris Evans配音很易讓人聯想起《復聯4》；看到末世場景和人機情誼不禁想，如果迪士尼不干預，會是動畫版《芬奇》嗎？
皮克斯今年没有拿出优秀的作品，年初的《青春变形记》虽然故事吸引眼球但本质上还是友情与家庭的认可，全然比不上《心灵奇旅》《寻梦环游记》一众电影的深度，本期待着这部《玩具总动员》的衍生片能带来惊喜，结果还是在固步自封。
过于套路了，当做toys系列人物背景补全看吧 - 6.7
这显然又是一部基于精细商业考量的迪士尼动画——与自我和解的安全普适主题、时空穿越的潮流科幻元素、屡试不爽的讨喜玩偶角色——简直不能更匹配合家欢观影诉求了（姑且无视LGBTQ）。尽管剧情无惊无喜，个人仍然给予推荐评价：一为巴斯光年的情怀加成；二为精致细腻的机甲设定，期待小队全员模型。
这就是安迪看完立刻想把角色抱回家的电影（我指SOX）
Time dilation的概念延展到本片的编剧创作当中，故事的跳跃性加速了剧情发展，无法建立完善的世界观和厚实的人物关系，以至于可以走捷径随意地创作出一个毫无说服力可言的反派角色。同样对于文本内容毫推动力量的同性角色，与其说是Disney自诩倡导其包容多元化的理念，不如说是更加符合当下时代商业上的需求。
作为一部来自《玩具总动员》的衍生作，并且还标榜了当年的主角安迪就是因为看了本片才买了巴斯光年的作品，最终呈现出来的效果却多少有些令人失望，毕竟这可是皮克斯出品，毕竟主角可是大名鼎鼎的巴斯光年，观众们的期望值自然会拉高，结果却迎来了一部平庸的冒险片。明明前期因为那持续失败的超高速而不得不见证自己的好友们逐渐老去的剧情设置非常能触动人心，中后期却因为那三位非常容易让人血压拉满的新兵蛋子们而直接变成极其俗套的冒险片，且捣乱次数远高于救场次数，导致一部只有1小时45分钟的电影看起来像是有两个多小时一样，尿点很足。而配音的话，虽然不是经典的蒂姆·艾伦有点可惜，但考虑到巴斯光年那经历时间跨度的情节和美国队长比较类似，且桃总也的确配得很出色，选他确实没什么问题，所以综合后6.6分，属于能看但很可惜的存在。
多一星给猫咪，整部电影所有人物加起来还不如一只机器猫有人性。
枯燥的时间旅行
全靠对玩具总动员的喜爱看完，电影本身还是有点无聊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
