剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 桃美 3小时前 :

    “战争对于所有个体来说是不幸,但它也创造了机会,去书写真相,去激烈地干预社会,用宏伟蓝图区改造社会。就像农民如果想种田,那怎么也得先下锄头。”在那样一种背景下,是怎样的信念会让他们把种种残酷变成骄傲的事实。演员能说得出那些话,真的也是太厉害了。“这下跟孙辈们可有的讲了,有多少人能说自己塑造过世界历史呢?”

  • 玥初 2小时前 :

    Rika实在太美了!!!就算变成诅咒也是粉红色的!!!剧情可能就四星吧但是好喜欢Rika!!!!被Yuta凶凶的时候反应好可爱(是小sub吧其实是小sub吧啊其实本来就是主仆嘛

  • 璐雪 2小时前 :

    作为动画片还是不错的,打斗,插曲都很棒,中规中矩是中二鬼怪日漫,作为电影在大荧幕,略弱。

  • 相鹏程 1小时前 :

    每个人的当下,都会觉得自己的国度,正确吗?

  • 谬香岚 3小时前 :

    一个小细节,唯一差点冒头的良心来自一个年纪比较大的官员,充满干劲的年轻人总是冲在残忍第一线,就挺真实的。

  • 闳问春 9小时前 :

    跨越时空的传承:开会不是讨论问题,而是发布通告。尽管代表们各有权重,人道主义在深渊中哑火地眨了眨眼,但最终都必须妥协于唯一。从1100万到0,个体差别毫无意义,动态消亡才是答案。文明如何堕落,疯狂如何写就,他都无须出现,但亘古笼罩于万湖之时空。

  • 许千柳 5小时前 :

    高效的一次会议,只是他们讨论的内容让人不寒而栗。

  • 沐舒荣 3小时前 :

    一群拥有高贵德意志血统的人,在讨论如何将“大规模的屠杀变成一种按部就班的工业操作”…

  • 桂枫 1小时前 :

    不怕追求与梦想发生偏差,就怕没有了追求梦想的活力与勇气。

  • 索问香 2小时前 :

    对白驱动型影片。英国制海权在手,苏联挡道西伯利亚,“特别处理”方案名正言顺登台唱戏。1942年“工作”推进,军方与政府代表齐聚,明里暗里争权、逢迎、趋利避害,十足官僚。核心议题明明极不寻常,衣冠楚楚与会各方却只管常态似的正经对答、协调互通,所有棘手问题都拿出了有力“措施”,使得“最终解决计划”圆满达成。(不过几十年前罢了,有什么制度、准则、安排或理想能亘古不变,这世界难保不会有更奇怪的时候。

  • 韵栀 1小时前 :

    如果忽略此次会议的议题,这就是一场非常标准的圆桌政治博弈,各派系间就自身利益最大化展开争论、说服、协商、妥协;然而即便派系观点和利益存在冲突,但他们在犹太人种族灭绝的问题上却是空前一致,令人不寒而栗。

  • 萱璟 8小时前 :

    不好看,节奏不好,而且这个音乐真的配的太不好了。。。

  • 蕾楠 3小时前 :

    德国人从多方面考虑处理犹太人问题的会议。会议的讨论十分细致,从国内外的政治环境、财产问题、交通运输、法律、外交、辖区管理等角度,分别探讨运送前、运送中、运送后可能带来的问题与对策,甚至对英美苏瑞等国存在的犹太人处理有了未来的预案,不过片中也多次反映一些处理的可行性不高。除此之外,更多地呈现了由此引发的官僚之间职权争夺、互相甩锅的现象。话说那个Stuckart博士多次和别人硬刚,坚持落实法律规定,在血统认定上强硬,我还以为他是个地下辛德勒,直到他后期来了个Zwangssterilisaionen,赶紧查了一下他的生平和他所谓的法律,也是绝了。另外,最后通过高度的分工与流程来保障德国军队的心理健康还真是严谨。这电影算是长见识了。

  • 浮杨柳 7小时前 :

    天啊好平庸,林漫威真的不会导电影,越是想把电影做成电影化,那些元素就越是和歌舞不搭

  • 永芷荷 7小时前 :

    五星让更多的人来看。会议效率如此之高,冷静理性地讨论清零“方案”,精确到人头和子弹消耗,让人不寒而栗。同时,发现1984年版本和2001BBC&HBO的版本。

  • 腾琛丽 7小时前 :

    开头平平无奇,越到后面越引人入胜(大概是因为悲剧倾向)喜欢双女主和声那段,但是讲真音乐性并没有觉得比歌舞青春之类的高多少,但是加菲和瓦内莎很可以,看到好久不出现在大银幕的俩人老了,内心感慨的同时又残念他俩不是银幕cp非要zzzq的安插一个黑人女,但是又转念一想,始终红不起来的两人有戏演就很好了🥲

  • 陀子怡 5小时前 :

    不寒而栗,一群道貌岸然的“优质人”在90分钟内制定出清晰的犹太人种族屠杀计划,人性的邪恶在他们心中泛滥成灾,那些个“专家”、“博士”趋炎附势,满嘴仁义道德讲究法律的“清理”异族,完全丧失自己的是非观,600万犹太人就这样死在你们屠刀下。

  • 道晗昱 8小时前 :

    整体OK吧,作为音乐剧缺少记忆点的音乐有点可惜。

  • 盛幼怡 7小时前 :

    一屋子手握极权的男人 冷静且理智地探讨如何实施种族灭绝的时候 生命在他们眼里不过只是冰冷的数字 不小心在观影期间走神后再回过头 还以为他们在讨论来年的旅游计划

  • 禧远 5小时前 :

    同样也需要愿意写作并且生活的艺术家们。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved