Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很喜欢这种温馨的画风，景色很美，海景山景都很迷人，迷途之家是我梦想中的家了。日常带小奇幻的风格也是我最喜欢的类型，虽然后面高潮部分确实有点三秒了，不过不影响整个片子带给我的感动。有些片需要讲很复杂的故事才能让人感动，有的片只是静静地铺陈叙述，就足够填满我的心。很喜欢！
芦田爱菜总会接到一些冷门题材、奇奇怪怪的作品啊... = =lll
6.5🌟吧，本来以为是个日常番，没想到是奇幻番，开片的时候感觉有点像龙猫的画风，其实我更想看结是如何解开心结和三人的日常生活
真的还不错哎 就是结尾有点理想化了 天海佑希进不了宝冢笑死
最后一段纯多余。
我还以为是温馨日常篇，大灾难下的人互舔伤口相互疗伤，后面剧情来个360°大转弯，竟然是玄幻打怪？就一般般吧。
好喜欢啊！
画风很不错 居然是芦田爱菜配音吗！
综合所有的现在社会最难面对的事情，电影是积极的，当然希望也是带来积极的一面，改变自己的消费和经济观念，适应当下社会的现实，也是很有警示作用。
“吞噬内心的悲鸣”。奇幻治愈向，迷途之家的受创者。结尾打怪时长太短，高潮没撑起来。
清新画风，可爱人物，神奇的老奶奶带领“捡来”的两个孙女住在漂亮的有求必应屋，见河童和各路地藏菩萨，最后用笛声和一支箭战胜恶怪。
画面没得说，尤其是自然景，太棒了。剧情就……一般吧，高潮那里太潦草了吧？
真的还不错哎 就是结尾有点理想化了 天海佑希进不了宝冢笑死
没有多少刻画灾难本体，而将重点放在心理创伤上，以（留在）家园作为手段来治愈家人的伤痛，突出家乡在人们心中无可取替的位置。
值得满分，就冲风景太美，看着就很治愈。这是个受创伤后努力治愈自己的故事，不禁想到“幸运的人用童年治愈一生，不幸的人用一生治愈童年”，但终其一生，总有那么一个人愿意和努力治愈你。
看完更焦虑了…（22岁马上面临1000w毕业生）
但是编剧节奏有点拉垮，无法很好共勉。配乐也是。还有人物性格和表现，有有点奇怪啊…
故事背景设置的很好 悲伤的人们成为后面妖怪出现的因由 说出“为什么是我”这句话一定很难过 但是活着就要面对 说不定什么时候就可以释怀了 希望每个迷途之人都能有温暖的家 大团圆真的太好了
蛮现实的，特别是前半段，没钱的感觉是真的窘迫…
好适合一个人静静的看这种温暖的电影 好希望可以住在迷途之家 拥有一个慈祥的奶奶 和一些长相“古怪”心地善良的奇妙物做朋友 忘掉一切烦恼 让平静温暖的生活治愈自己
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
