The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
从黑山岛的无人识字的自在宁静，俯视朝廷中的尔虞我诈的伦理野蛮。
哦它又双叒叕传说中的水墨电影噶~~~你咋就知道没有龙王呢？SB拍个素媛2难道不更香吗？
这部电影最好的点就在于它是黑白电影，那种烟雨袅袅的水墨画很有感觉，可以把观众一下拉进了古代，而且它的叙事能力也不孬，封建思想与西方现代思想冲突很给力，关键还有历史事件做背景，这样就很难不给高分了。
哈哈哈哈，我竟然看出了一股“搞创作理论的真的见到很多有价值的题材时很冲动很纯真”的味道。还像极了电影青年，以及电影青年寻找合伙人的那种过程。
都是读书人，为功名为信仰还是为求知，却是大不同。行至水穷处，坐看云起时，看邻人反思，想到故里无数人把青春与精力不是耗费在筑墙上，就是耗费在破墙上，实在叫人叹息。
人之有限事之无奈，贬谪不可归，苛政猛于虎。唯春花秋月山水苍翠大海无言。
洞悉上层腐朽倾心西学的遭贬大儒邂逅向往功名醉心理学的小渔夫，从两个方向说尽了一个体系的活力与困境。即席汉诗酬答的那段让中国观众分外感动。没想到韩国还能拍出这么纯粹的东亚文人电影，黑白摄影的海面和树影，有日本电影的动态而无日式建筑的拘谨，文人意趣则让人想起《孔夫子》那时候的中国电影，真心让人赞叹。要说不足，大概是两位主角之外的配角们都刻画得较为脸谱化，功能性过强。
控制情绪观感的尺度拿捏得好。黑白摄影太精致了，是古典传统的美感，但跟海风麻布的粗粝感觉自然割裂开来。其实单纯一点都好，岔开的师徒线反而搅散精气神。
“不再想去研究复杂善变的人类，要转去研究通透明净的事物，用（新鲜实在的）事物来忘记（那个曾被过份放大的小）我。”是自低贱近鱼虾腥气，还是入浊世恶臭两班，师徒互为观照的入世出世。纯黑白风景舒服极了，126分钟浑然不觉负累，近期最佳韩影（看见有人说如果有这样一部苏东坡就好了，哭了😭）。演的最好是胖婶，记住了这位黄金女配。4.5
3.5。前半部分挺好，后半部分太明显开始讲道理。最怕韩国电影这种沉重的气息。3.5给了四星而不是三星，因为第一次知道有《兹山鱼谱》这个东西，了不起的来历。这位作者想必会是东坡的神交之友
近现代化转型痛苦下的传统士大夫写照，听到这些诗、经，如此亲切；避开日益空谈的大学之道，趋向自然趋向宇宙奥秘，一个将流放生活也过得乐在其中，乐以忘忧的贤者，这些符合中国审美旨趣的影像，却被韩国电影表现的自然、通透，毫不造作。
吹不副实。用韩片惯有的插科打诨及暴虐冲动来加工《思悼》的厚重与苍凉，甚为无趣。
洞悉上层腐朽倾心西学的遭贬大儒邂逅向往功名醉心理学的小渔夫，从两个方向说尽了一个体系的活力与困境。即席汉诗酬答的那段让中国观众分外感动。没想到韩国还能拍出这么纯粹的东亚文人电影，黑白摄影的海面和树影，有日本电影的动态而无日式建筑的拘谨，文人意趣则让人想起《孔夫子》那时候的中国电影，真心让人赞叹。要说不足，大概是两位主角之外的配角们都刻画得较为脸谱化，功能性过强。
你讲多少次都掐不灭他想趟一回的欲望。
2、影片表面上讲的是一个贬谪士大夫的流亡生活，道出的却是人生意义的真相——所谓人生的意义，其实只是自己的事。你觉得有意义，那就有意义。由此想到一句话：知识都是灰色的，而生活的金树长青！说得真好。
韩国似乎终于拍古装不那么尬了，不强行高大上之后，有了另一个问题：电视剧感。
历史维度下的朝鲜有着“小中华”的称号，片中的人物服饰和礼仪文化等都受着儒家文化的影响，朱子理学与天主教教义的碰撞是关于传统旧思想的反思，历史题材电影的思想观点传达是此片最值得讨论的内容
在韩国近代化“睁眼看世界”的士大夫身上，对儒家的反思激荡在现代时空。导演李睿益几乎拍遍了韩国各个阶段的历史，高句丽时期、朝鲜王朝、日据时期，用现代人的视角去挖掘历史，越挖越深，电影越拍成本越低，终于挖到了“思想性”这个底层逻辑了。
要说是李导最重形式感而轻戏剧性的一部吗？非贬义，反倒是浅浅的欣喜。因为似乎品到了那么一点儿大象无形的意思了。个人太喜欢全片基本保持的黑白影调，光的质感很通透，仿佛感受到海边灿烂的艳阳和波浪上明晃晃的反光，令黑山这个流放地，也撇去了荒凉贫瘠苦寒之感，而是充满暖意和安慰。故事风格是潜水深流，平静而有力。值得看。
对那个来说是罪人，来到我家就是客人。朴实的妇人明白，但许多人不明白。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
