Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
情绪调动不起来，看一部忘一部。搞笑大于推理。可是又没达到预期，角色太多了
顺利共情到“反派”，不觉得很不公平吗，如果不是“反派”，这个巴斯光年就会变成反派，总有一个人会宿命般的成就另一个人，以没有选择的悲剧成就另一个人的所谓的救赎和圣母心，草啊，凭什么。
达子第一次吃瘪吧。电影好长，略感无聊。最后的反转不知道是不是已经被我摸清了套路，也没那么刺激了。不过看到小少爷被耍还是挺爽的。
To the infinity and beyond!
虽然过程有些牵强，结局也猜到多少了，但是还是有点惊喜！
絮絮叨叨的巴斯光年原来一直都这么神经质。有信念真好，相信自己是对的，但盲目自信千万不能，执念太深最后会变成自己最大的对手。宠物猫简直就是喵喵队立大功，如果陪伴型机器宠物喵宠物汪都这么强大还不得卖断货？啥时候给胡迪、翠丝、牧羊女也拍个前传？每个玩具都有它自己的故事。
真情实感，才能骗过所有人。英雄就是，对的人出现在对的地方。
光年正传和玩具总动员一点关系也没有，通篇是以人类为视角，各种作死征服太空，再次沦为了俗套的冒险电影。ZZZQ和各种同性恋桥段看得也很无感，Chris Evans配音又如何？他只不过是个为迪士尼打工的旗下艺人罢了。imdb目前4.6分，皮克斯所有动画片里的历史最低分！
真用力的表演。。日本好编剧都卷在漫画行业吧
和玩具总动员系列毫不相关，迪士尼如果原创能力为0了，我其实并不介意老IP故事新讲或是前世今生讲自传的。电影无功无过，但平庸到彩蛋我都能提前猜到。
以前只是骗中骗，现在就是合谋给骗子下套，其实挺有趣，下一部的舞台剧说主场在伦敦，什么时候演呢？
日吹替：铃木亮平/今田美樱 sox=山内 一直很期待铃木亮平的吹替 比较失望（所以大哥还是去演戏比较好 另两位懒得评价 启用明星吹替来引导票房很常见 但我一般都比较喜欢pro cv配的版本 剧情部分：很正统 无功无过 补足了巴斯光年的前世今生 就酱
电影本身没有前几部好，很容易猜到反转部分的情节发展，但是基本制作质量还是有保证的，依然是合格的商业片续作，看看下饭挺合适。
全员小猫，赤星也成了小猫，小猫杰西活在了台词里，只有小朋友蒙在鼓里，最后是真假屋子骗局，可惜假国际刑警已经慌了没有发现，进了假屋子留下了密码和指纹。
一如既往的精彩，而且随着剧集增多，可用的NPC也越来越多，从而不断抬高骗局的精彩阈值永远。战无不胜的达子，永远猜不透的理查德，永远只有小少爷一个人受伤的世界，以及以特别的方式致敬结子和haruma的设定都太棒了。不知道还会不会有下一部，希望达子再骗我一次。
日本人对欧洲的执念实在太深了，剧本很好，可是效果没有那么..开头听了半天都没听出来是法语啊救命
7.5一贯的先扬后抑再扬的手法，主角团怎么吃瘪都无所谓，最后一定会再兜回来，猜谁是大boss以及各种反转埋点比较有意思，中间一度认为警察就是槌子蛇，猜对了又没完全对，比较尴尬，话说布这么老大的局得花多少钱啊，还有这些演员都不用培训就上岗啊，配合都天衣无缝啊
皮克斯的故事在创意上永远走在前面，每个节点都是意料之外的转折，但是如果为了意料之外的创意而舍弃掉打磨好故事，确实不是皮克斯的风格了～
Top Gun: Sox / Andy当年要真看的是这部，那估计也就不会买巴斯光年，也就没玩具总动员什么事了，养个猫不好吗？
你发表的关于《Lightyear》的短评，因为 含有违法或不良信息，已被移除。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
