Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
还行吧。没太大感触。我和我的鬼朋友一起干死杀人犯的故事。杀人犯礼貌又磨叽，一脸活不过一部电影时长的友好模样。
不恐怖，三观挺正的。变态杀手有点意思，肯定有犯罪行为和心理分析能解释他和他的面具。小演员演得不错
很有趣的电影，不露脸的伊桑霍克可是巨大的牺牲了 20220724
结局有点出乎意料，让脑洞大开的我略诧异，男主难道不是应该死在了另外一个平行时空里才更有意思吗？😂
“总有一天，你得站出来保护自己。”
面对各种暴力时的友爱、坚定、互助，可以跨越生死阻隔，甚至创造奇迹，但最终一定是回归到自立，永不放弃。惊悚奇情的外壳，热血意气的内核。几段纪实复古质感的影像声画以及正能量的导向是亮点。小男主反击时全场鼓掌。
啊这。史上最怂最弱反派连环杀手，史上最牛逼小学生！本来以为能有啥新花样...这啥呀这是...小学生看看可以(-ι_- )
斯蒂芬金式p孩故事爱好者非常喜欢 满嘴爆粗的妹妹太可爱了
恐怖屋出品的这部恐怖片其实还不错 小演员也演的不错 但是ethan演的这个角色并不出彩 只是一个喜欢掳杀小孩的怪胎 希望和小孩玩游戏 出彩的还是小男孩 小男孩能通过黑色电话与逝去的孩子们通信 寻找逃生办法 小女孩则能通过梦锁定事件发生地 但小女孩作用不大 这个电影还围绕了校园暴力 小男孩这个主角是被霸凌的的一方 结局看似也算校园暴力的结束🔚 黑色电话玩了个概念 也就是与死者的媒介 但其实电影有几幕还是挺可怕的 不是传统的jumpscare 果然blumhouse就是厉害 环球这次估计又可以赚很多
为什么这个男主就成了邱森万
一般，没有什么悬念，感觉一切都在情理中。同类型的可爱的骨头感觉更胜一筹。
最后的绝杀每一个小伙伴都没有白死，坑，铁栅栏，电话，冰箱肉，密码锁。居然是可以看下来纯英文字幕的哎……
前面略显拖拉，后面还是蛮精彩的，但是无论如何小学生是不可能打败杀人狂魔的，除非在电影里。
5.6/10，一切都显得那么莫名其妙，无缘无故。
芬尼长大肯定是个帅哥
最后一段走上中学人生巅峰的剧情有点起点了，前面都可圈可点，偶尔响起的不知道应该期待还是恐惧的电话铃声让人神经一直紧绷，几个少年的突然出现也很有恐怖氛围，整体的紧张感比小丑回魂高了好几个档次，可能漂亮国人看小丑天然带debuff吧，那片子真的一点也不惊悚。再一次被伊桑霍克的表现惊艳，他对声线语调的把握真的堪称精妙。
还算不太平庸的恐怖片吧，奇幻元素让整体显得更娱乐化了一些。
本质上还是在讲青少年成长，元素（雨天、黄雨衣、红靴子、气球）和内核都在致敬《小丑回魂》；小女孩梦境那条线有些鸡肋，对情节发展没起到太大推动作用；配乐加分，小男孩逃脱部分用了Pink Floyd的《on the run》，循序渐进的旋律和紧凑的鼓点把焦躁、惊恐、紧张的氛围烘托出来了～
这片子意想不到的很好看，主角兄妹俩非常勇敢，演技都在线，片尾还有个反转~~
中规中矩，伊桑霍克就是想演个变态杀人狂就找个剧本给他拍着玩吧 ？！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
