Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一众顶级大神参与制作，导致观众过高的期待，促使评价进一步降低。
即便未来这个世界结束生命，地球迎向毁灭的命运，我们到时候，仍会成为巨大螺旋的一部分吧……”
当老虚这样的精神病讲腻了黑深残，转而想描述爱情故事的时候会怎样？答案是他会把一个泡泡的破碎做成了一场跨物种的梦幻生死恋
跑酷运动凑出来两场戏，还是变成了套路爱情片，歌变成了泡沫结局是一场空。
太老套了，看上一句就猜到下一句，关键是我非常讨厌人鱼公主的情节。虽然我是因为预告片的配乐想看的，但是正片里重复几十遍直到耳朵起茧也不必吧！！而且还有好多强行煽情配乐！以及为什么一到近景和特写，画风就突变成我非常非常难以忍受的画风类型了！天哪！！
设定和剧情都好迷，可惜了这么好的画风。男主是个性格恶劣的害人精，减一星
叙述上，虽然画面很唯美，但是剧情部分太少，反而像是加长版音乐mv，配角除了喜欢大姐的队长和惹事小孩外其他队员没任何印象，有这个一个半小时多的时长都不够刻画好BB的人物吗？
看了pv以后就一直在期待这部，加上强大的阵容就更期待了结果，跑酷版小美人鱼？
美人鱼+第三类接触，经五人之手改出的剧本，细碎也没辙。跑酷动作和泡泡特效倒是拉满，很适合在影院欣赏
荒木哲郎，作为曾经你的粉丝，我还能信任你吗？
老虚你自己看看你写的东西，看得下去吗？原画师炫技片
◎人鱼公主告诉我们，比如梦幻泡影，脆弱，但能拯救世界。
达到了剧场版大片的制作水准，无可挑剔的作画与稳定发挥的音乐担当泽野弘之
就很平庸的一部……几个大神合作结果产出如此平庸…本质还是海的女儿爱情故事。
5。比个人预期要好一些，原本是抱着寄的心态，看完只能说大佬们和wit在制作上确实敬业，就是老虚可能是受限于题材和资方导致剧本非常一般，小畑健的人设个人也不喜。《你的名字》已经是6年前的电影，业界（甚至包括新海诚本人）都是时候走出风景+灾难+爱情片的舒适圈了——对《すずめの戸締まり》同样不抱太高期望。
还是一个老问题：现在的霸权社除了炫技究竟还会什么？ 经历了Vivy高概念低执行的平庸之作，还有《国王排名》的慢节奏恶疾之后，我对于这部干瘪的命题作文已经挑不出更多优点出来。（除了作画，也仅限于此）当然，除了虚渊玄的脚本拉胯之外，导演荒木哲郎也要背很大的锅，因为文戏和调度真是差得不行。 无论是跑酷桥段，还是感情戏，又亦是高光时刻，要么扭扭捏捏，要么就是松驰。 既没有剧情片该有的稳健，也没有爽片那般畅快有力。除了吐槽故事和人物还有不上心的霸权社，本片也没什么有意义的东西值得观众留念。
动作踩点设计得这么带感，什么时候做款游戏呗😆
面具人问要不要买鞋还怪可爱的！
日本近几年动画电影产业能不能别再造出这种画面精美但故事稀烂的垃圾了？对得起人家画师吗
慎最后为队员开路，用自己偏重的金属义肢做重心甩着自己向前奔跑真的很酷！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
