剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 水含巧 3小时前 :

    首先它是一部网大,游戏题材的网大。现实世界与游戏世界互相交织着,主角是一个很平凡的小主播,为了取得儿子的监护权,不得不参加比赛去拿比赛的奖金来买XQF。剧情虽无新意,但胜在完成度较高好评。

  • 赖静娴 8小时前 :

    游戏视角给人感觉非常专业,然后游戏体验也给人感觉很真实。一开始大家不熟悉的时候就是都觉得彼此很菜鸟,然后互相指责甩锅,然后度过漫漫磨合期,就成为了最默契的队友,这种团队感真的非常打动我。

  • 频德馨 2小时前 :

    1、引人入胜的沉浸式游戏画面;

  • 藏平和 4小时前 :

    网络电影真的有进步,但和真的电影比,网络电影最大的缺陷是“系统性”,类型的贯彻,审美系统的高度统一,视听系统的互相配合。

  • 钊海 6小时前 :

    不玩吃鸡,但电影拍的还行,尤其在团队合作和最后决战设计。

  • 骏栋 9小时前 :

    结尾高潮【他装起来了,他装起来了……】

  • 皮景天 7小时前 :

    虽然没玩过吃鸡,但二十年前参加CS比赛的经历足以唤起对这部电影的理解和感动。

  • 琪萱 6小时前 :

    缺点:

  • 震运 2小时前 :

    剧情俗、没悬念到极致。但是吃鸡战场的还原度还是可以的。为啥这种热血剧总要配备一个女神小姐姐负责疗伤?参考哪吒重生也是这个路数。

  • 言天曼 0小时前 :

    我印象中第一部还算可以看的内地游改电影,完成度不低,对于游戏的总体还原度也很有诚意,演员也没有拉跨,至少达到了电视剧水平,但这故事实在也太老土了吧,都2021年了还在讲这样的小人物翻身故事,男的loser就是蓬松头、啤酒罐满地、烟屁股塞满烟灰缸,这种刻板刻画真太过时了。无脑是故事的另一个硬伤,一帮人非要窝在破房子训练,就算不去富家女家,那全世界就没别的地方了是吧?决赛都胜券在握了,还要花1500万买通排名倒数队伍的一个队员,只为了保证自己拿到第一名,而第一名的奖金只有500万,报个仇花1500万,这不是脑瘫是什么?不能细品,当一乐看。7分以上,太高了。

  • 梅彩 6小时前 :

    超出预期,热血、燃情,既有电竞的沸腾感和真实感,又能展现生活的平凡与朴实,这样一部真人吃鸡题材的电影,做到这个地步,主创真的用心了,好看!

  • 邶敏叡 3小时前 :

    虽然名字挺二,剧情套路常见,那个女主也是满足宅男幻想,但总体挺有意思

  • 瑞桓 3小时前 :

    这两个小时很充实,很开心。

  • 鲁丁兰 7小时前 :

    单论故事和场面制作来说,可以打5星,但是本人的价值观里,游戏还不是正道。男主是邓超+吴耀汉,片子刚开始让人想起《老男孩》,继续看想起《少林足球》,再看想起《阿郎的故事》,看到最后一拍大腿,《头号玩家》。总之是不错的,片尾留了彩蛋,应该是想做第二部。希望能够引导价值观回归。祝福!

  • 露寒 4小时前 :

    故事构架比较套路化,但是题材和手法很新颖,成本应该不高,但效果一流,导演胡国瀚很有想法,演员基本都不出戏,够7.5!不过开拍了里面,胡导有点太心机了,甚至有点阴的可怕。

  • 菅长逸 1小时前 :

    推荐指数四颗星,打分应该会给到7-7.5。扣分点很明显,剧情推进和人物设定上的爽文套路化嘛。

  • 贾碧莹 2小时前 :

    做电影,真的是一分钱一分货,这个片子除去营销层面不谈,能把大比重的钱花在制作上,就确实为行业带了正向的推动。希望票房能好,这样大家也不用都束手束脚的工作了。

  • 格初 6小时前 :

    缺点:

  • 蓝孤兰 2小时前 :

    游戏部分还是炫的,搞笑的点也有,节奏也不慢,似曾相识的桥段多得让人出戏。倡导的价值观有点害人,游戏可以麻痹自己,赢了满足成就感,输了也不怕,大不了再来一局,不怕输不起。游戏可以,现实能行吗?现实中输了就去游戏里拼吗?有多少人能通过游戏改编命运?有多少人能通过游戏挣一套学区房?永远循环在输了之后再来一局的游戏里奋斗至死吗?游戏里输一次可以复活,现实你输一次只能幻想平行空间去吧。7.4/1.06万

  • 牵华荣 4小时前 :

    若不是网大的身份、炒作起来方便,这片子连5分都不知道有没有……

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved