Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
主角完全长在审美点上 满屏的肉体就很美好 but又是一部无病呻吟的作品😅 看脸看肉就好了
其实有点难以评价 总体拍的比较一般吧 但是社畜部分拍的还挺真实的 人在年轻的时候不管多么豪言壮语在成为了社会人以后很难不会被毒打 喊话那段好喜欢啊 也get到了女主的颜值 摄影画面和配乐也都还可以
与其叫流浪的心，还是心猿意马好。男主陷入的与其说是中年危机，不如说是自己内心多重的困境与责任叠加。家庭与自我的纠葛，生活与精神的纠缠，让他需要一段时间去治愈，男主好帅，摄影的调色很爱。
除了故事性有点弱，还是很好笑的，为什么分这么低？
介于好与坏之间的电影…… 对柳叔的表演感到遗憾 不是说演的不好 而是确实这几年接的角色有点同质化 中年人混乱而又无奈的人生演得很好 但也想看柳叔别的表现。 刘镇的角色如果是高中时的我应该会很喜欢吧？但现在 全部看下来对和男主前妻在一块的有点软弱的出版社长最喜欢 因为这才是见得到的可爱普通人。其他人可爱吗？也可爱 但有点和生活较劲了 看着累。 片尾曲很适合这部电影！
每次遇到自我的矛盾，克制情绪，爆发，都会选择逃避，却也渴望亲密的关系。
前面还在想女主这么美为什么非要选这个角落里的男生，一直揣着这个疑问还算有兴致，但答案揭晓的时候，已经让人失去了兴趣，特别是床戏，一点诚意也没有，如果不想拍大可不必有这么一段丝毫没有情欲感受不到任何爱意的，穿着厚厚浴袍做爱的画面，实在是感到不适。
站在阳台上，看着眼前的景色，他似乎找到了生活中的一丝光。
太有意思的故事，今年最好看的韩影喜剧片。每个人都自带喜感，顺带还把柳承龙给掰弯了，笑死。一家子没有一个正常人，好朋友和前妻谈了十年秘密恋爱，儿子喜欢年长的女人，自己和小三结婚生女当了留守爸爸，却没想到被Gay看上，最后虽然没点明，相信一定弯了没跑。吴政世戏不多，可真是个大恶人。金熙元的哭可太搞笑了。
最后 他从大厂辞职了
这可怎么活呀
“我不再是那个能听你倾诉的人了。”
男主女主男配一人一星！前半段一直姨母笑，甜甜恋爱好好看，剧情从打棒球开始有点垮了，后来男主刚有点起色影片却结束了🔚
只有两个片段还有回忆，其它的太聒噪了……
老男人被掰弯的故事，隐隐约约不管是哪里都很好笑，虽然狗血但是我喜欢这个故事，最后半小时开始就很弱了倒是真的，结尾也很老套。但是好笑好笑
——这无聊的人生啊，只有切断的手指带来一点点短暂的刺激
题材是我喜欢的款，但这属于文本不错，但影像特别没感觉的那种电影吧。
前后怎么会这么割裂啊…喜欢的两个点，不准太阳升起却向着黎明奔跑，因为有人受伤才察觉寡淡。
莱昂纳多依然帅爆——50往上了….演技是真的好，每帧对脸拍的表情细节真实、令人共情，本子弱了点….这样的人生困境时时都有，不分肤色地区，不要太清醒，跟着感觉走就是了……3星
挺好玩的，故事简单，也可以说没有故事，每段场景都蛮搞笑的，一点也不尬，也没有瞎煽情。我也不知道那些跟院线上亿大片去对标打一两星的都是什么心态。实际七八十分的水平，多打一颗星拉拉分。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
