Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
一个尝试自我救赎的故事，赌局和回忆相互穿插， 编剧真的有在为观众努力减轻剧本的沉重感了。赌桌上那个USA玩家讽刺值直接拉满。总的来说还挺有意思吧
Wosp 里没人在乎你是谁，只在乎你的手腕上有没有金手链～
在男主给小白15万美元，让他回家看妈妈时，我如醍醐灌顶，这部把男主往救世主拍的自恋爆棚的作品，必然是自编自导，这种剂量的自恋，我上次还是在《文科恋曲》里大受折磨。 奥斯卡·伊萨克实际上扮演的就是保罗·施拉德想象中的自己。
确实不是我喜欢的类型，还挺斯科塞斯的。最后高潮没推起来，男主以为自己被救赎了那里跟小孩一样表演出问题了
要么老老实实拍玩牌，要么老老实实拍复仇，这又是复仇又是玩牌。。。
片尾曲有后劲，但全片里太多本该用来建设人物动机但用在闲聊上的无效镜头，属于那种自己说了算型的编导，可以删的东西太多，可以加的东西也太多；话说看了十五分钟，意境营造手法上就感觉像极了《出租车司机》，上来一看果然是相同的编剧。
7.5分，一部看似绝望却充满希望的电影，气质是另一个维度的《出租车司机》，奥斯卡伊萨克太有魅力了我的天！
搞不懂女主角的存在意义，男二一个就能顶上她的作用。
daddy还是那个daddy，一把掀翻小屁孩的时候我只能 wow~ 其实配乐都很好听，就是用力过度了一点，太想营造纸醉金迷的糜烂气氛了，以至于整部电影都像一篇“散”文诗。
7.2冷静克制的描述虐囚丑闻，威廉的戏太少，演技无从发挥
这种题材居然一点镜头语言都没有 还不如看美剧
这个赌王不太冷。赌王线和复仇线双线把控，都停在肾上腺素飙升的临界点，简而言之就是看起来不太爽。在平凡的故事线对比之下，人物多了很多细节描写，用布家具把所有家具包裹起来的癖好，结尾发现是反派教官的癖好；google地图看到的反派教官家门口照片，成为结尾处小跟班深入敌营的线索... 就连随时擦枪走火的情侣，也要眉来眼去到最后。
搞不懂女主角的存在意义，男二一个就能顶上她的作用。
这实际是一个关于救赎他人和自我救赎失败了的故事。男主是阿布格莱布监狱虐囚门事件的一名士兵，因为拍了虐囚自拍照，被判刑了，坐牢时自学成为赌神。出狱后成为职业赌徒，收益不错，但精神世界还在坐牢和赎罪，然后遇到了前战友的儿子，儿子一直想找虐囚的上司报仇，男主想帮助男孩精神解脱，最后给钱让其还债回归正常生活，没想到男孩去报仇还死了，男主放弃比赛亲自上阵杀了虐囚上司，然后报警坐牢。影片展现了战争，暴行&PTSD对美军及其家人的伤害，当男主以为自己及男孩获得了解脱的时候，却又发现自己已经无法摆脱心里的阴影，反而在牢里才能获得暂时的平静。这片子我不喜欢，我给3星6.3分，删掉了！
4.5 / 第一部施拉德。粗俗如我只在本片 get 到了伊萨克的肉体，所以，肉欲爆棚却演这么个冷淡阴沉的角色太违和了。而且凡梦境就用 VR 镜头展现，莫不是施拉德拜了毕赣为师？戴上眼镜才能身临其境罢了。
Oscar Isaac最近出任主演有一种很不好的趋势，大家一起感慨他有多帅还有称赞围绕他打造的服化道有多华丽成为了出演电影差不多唯一值得讨论的东西。当然不是说他是个充分性意义上的坏演员，但事情变成这样就挺尴尬的。赌牌本身是个非常容易被overvalued的题材（作为半个统计系学生这个题材我印象里唯一跟靠谱沾边的是《决胜21点》…），这片子里甚至连牵强附会都很勉强单纯就拿出来凑数的，除了主演其他人也可有可无宛如路人，想说的东西导演拍了那么多年都要说烂了，结果我们就回到了只能干夸一下男主角造型真不错的境地
ᐈ一个好的牌手能看穿你的想法，无论你是戴上耳塞，穿连帽衫，带上棒球帽，眼镜还是面具，都不能阻挡他看穿你的视线
剧情过于平淡 ，穿插了臭名昭著关塔那摩监狱 ，虐囚回忆 ，威廉达福客串了 一个小角色 ，并未提高影片的成色 。
男主的表演好棒，起初面无表情的赌博机器，发现小伙子去报仇丧命时候的微张的鼻翼，最后发现喜欢的人来探监时候会心一笑
背景故事線挺好的 夾雜了愛情線後 讓人一頭霧水
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
